Our History
In 1975, the Central District of California
initiated Pretrial Services, after being named one
of the ten nationwide demonstration districts. The
success of the research project lead congress to
enact the Pretrial Services Act of September 16,
1982, which was updated on October 12, 1994. Title
18 U.S.C. 3152-3156 establishes and defines the
functions of Pretrial Services. On June 1, 1988,
Pretrial Services in the Central District of
California became an independent agency of the
court, with Mr. John W. Luymes being appointed the
first Chief U.S. Pretrial Services Officer in the
district. Thomas W. Nuelle was appointed the second
chief on March 25, 1996. The current chief is George
M. Walker, who was appointed on April 10, 2000.
Pretrial Services performs two major functions:
1. INVESTIGATION and verification
of each defendant's suitability for release on bail,
considering [1] the risk of nonappearance for future
court appearances, and [2] the danger he/she
presents to the community and/or him/herself.
2. SUPERVISION of those persons
released on bond. Those who are released on bond may
be subject to conditions of release which requires
them to report to a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer.
Additional conditions may include travel restrictions,
employment/education requirements, drug and/or
alcohol testing, placement in a residential
substance abuse treatment program, mental health
treatment, internet restrictions, and/or location
monitoring. The court is promptly notified of any
alleged violation of release conditions with a
recommendation for appropriate action.
Pretrial Services provides the judicial officer, who
sets bail or reviews a previous order, with a
written report giving verified information when
available regarding the defendant's community ties,
employment, finances, health, and prior arrest
record.
Copies of the written report, which includes a bail
recommendation and appropriate release conditions,
where applicable, are provided to both the
government and defense counsel at the time of the
hearing. It should be noted that by statute [Title
18 U.S.C. 3153c, 1-3], information obtained in the
course of performing pretrial functions is
confidential and can only be used for purposes of
bail determination, and is governed by
confidentiality regulations. This information is not
admissible on the issue of guilt in any criminal
proceedings unless for perjurious statements made to
secure pretrial release, or for failure to appear at
subsequent court hearings during the pendency of the
case.
One of the important functions of Pretrial Services
is to report any apparent violation of release
conditions promptly to the court and the U.S.
Attorney, giving a recommended course of action
[e.g., warrant, citation, or hold in abeyance].
It is of interest to note that failure to appear has
not been a significant problem in the Central
District of California during the years of
operation.